Rhone, a solution to Red’s problems or more of the same?

So another take over rumour.

It’s about time we had one as it’s only been oh a few weeks since the last one. Recently we’ve had an Indian businessman an assorted collection of oil rich, middle east glitterati and now some more Americans in the form of something called Rhone.

So far none of these have produced anything concrete but perhaps the Rhone rumour might have more mileage? Hicks and Gillett need £100m and fast – The Royal Bank of Scotland say they must reduce the club debt of £237m by this amount this summer. As befitting their behaviour since they joined us, they aren’t about the raid their own coffers so surely the first place they will look is their home market purely on the grounds that they are familiar with it?

One hopes that those who are checking the credentials of Rhone will ensure that they don’t try and take a page out of Hicks and Gillett’s book by landing us in more debt. It would also be interesting to see if there has been any connection with Hicks, Gillett and Rhone in the past – the old boy network?

It’s been suggested that the Rhone involvement will reduce the club’s debt by half. Great so we are half way to getting out of the s*** the original cowboys put us in! If it does happen it’s been suggested that, as a consequence, Hicks and Gillett’s shareholding will be reduced to 30% each, a potential problem when making boardroom decisions? We shall see.

One thing I’m pretty certain about is that this is not the outcome many fans wanted. I suspect the majority would rather see Hicks and Gillett leave the club completely! Perhaps we may yet achieve this if Rhone’s involvement reduces the debt, increases creditworthiness and makes us a more attractive investment opportunity to others? However I doubt it. Statler and Waldorf won’t go unless they leave with a handsome profit and they know that if they ride out this rocky period and see the stadium built, there will be more commercial opportunities to exploit and therefore more riches to enjoy?

And Rhone? What is annoying to me and I suspect many others is that so far comments have been confined to the debt. There has been no indication on what Rhone’s involvement means for the new stadium, new players and of course Rafa or do we just take it as read? It’s almost as if the overall interests of the club are second to Hicks’ and Gillett’s short term cash flow problem, and Rhone’s involvement.

Perhaps this says more about where Rhone’s priorities lie? For example they do not have demonstrable history of involvement in football, or any sport? Will they have the clubs interests, in the long term, at heart or are they in it for a “quick buck”? I seriously doubt the former. They are a company that invests in potential business opportunities for short term profit. They are businessmen so would hardly invest in Liverpool unless they expecting some sort of return? I suspect they will, as soon as the balance sheet or business opportunity presents itself, jump ship with a profit giving scant regard for the long term interests of the club.

Perhaps I’ll be proved wrong and Rhone might demonstrate a hitherto unseen philanthropic side to their make up. However, on the face of they seem to be no better than the current star spangled incumbents? Worse still could it be that Hicks and Gillett’s perceived solution to their problems might see the club getting into even deeper trouble?

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Rhone, a solution to Red’s problems or more of the same?

  1. Gano says:

    No cash rich fools exist these days , apart from Arabs, they will not allow yanks to fleece them. Rhone is a starting pistol in the race to take the club forward, don’t forget our yanks had a sporting history yet look at us now!. Can we wave Rhone away?, no! The stadium is a major cash cow and Rhone can see that too as you stated, would we believe them if they came in claiming to be Liverpool fans anyway.

    • redfloyd says:

      We can wave Rhone away as they will prop up Hicks and Gillett. The longer they fail to get fresh investment the more desperate they will become and the more their hand will be forced. Increasing the likelyhood of a total buy out?

      I’m not viewing this through rose tinted spectacles unrealistically hoping that some benevolent footballing “sugar daddy” of a Liverpool fan will come along and basically “give” money to the club. It would be wrong not to expect people to have a return on their investment eventually.

      However equally no one wants someone who makes promises they can’t keep, pulls the wool over our eyes over the way they dealt with the finances to achieve this and then steadfastly refuses to do the honourable thing and sod off when they’ve been found out.

      A happy, sensible middle ground between these two extremes would be great.

  2. shami says:

    sick and tired of all this crap, need results and something concrete soon. Been waiting for something to happen for the last 3 years.
    want someone serious to take over. Lack of investment over the last two seasons is costing our club. All the fans are aware that we have needed additional two wold class players for the last two seasons but no sign of that happening. I am fully behid rafa as i dont think it is all his fault he is doing what he can with what he has got. Need right winger and another quality striker to compliment torres and also left back as insua not quite there as he is one for the future.

  3. Gano says:

    Shami!, Rafa still signed some crap players, or maybe someone else did?????

  4. shami says:

    gano: it was always going to be difficult finding quality players with limited budget. babbel, lucas , riera to name a few where 10 mil or less. i aggree he has made some bad signings but when spending big he has not let us down, media are always on his case spending around 240 milion during his time but he has recouped around 160 mil in transfers. Not to mention the fact we missed out on players like daniel alves, florent malouda for the sake of a couple of million. im just so fustrated and i think anybody else that comes in will have the same problems as rafa is facing especially with city and even totenham’s spending power.

  5. Gano says:

    As far as i can see H&G are in trouble now and £100m is nothing really, it’s a shame DIC don’t want to deal at all with the yanks?. They could work with them and then force them out, £100m is not a lot for 40% for gods sake. Surely we will have plenty of groups wanting to barge in now, can we afford to wait much longer???

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s